As soon as our sight falls on the next poster and Jayson Stethem appears at us in person — we can be precisely assured — that the film will be strong and very man's with firing, pursuits, murders, sexual chicks, beautiful cars and money. Money — which correct our world - dictate steps and acts, money — which eat soul and force to go on the transaction with devils, money — which any doors are capable to open and to solve the most delicate questions, money — which from friendly any communications destroy to the family.
The film outset — just also is money, the big money, and also such concepts, as honor and a debt in underworld. Protagonist Arthur plant on very dangerous crime. Him force to kill own friend, from this point on the picture gets a little other character — instead of the strong insurgent, we receive nevertheless a strong melodrama with all inherent attributes of purely man's cinema. Here only skillfully to connect these two genres is an art of the higher test — namely competent and harmonious work of a script writer, the director, the operator and, of course, actors.
If to face the truth — that a film it has turned out not absolutely such as it would be desirable, skillfully to connect two genres hasn't turned out. In a film the moral aspect that is good for a melodrama, a drama, but in any way for the insurgent is too overloaded. Thus in scenery courses — too there is big variety — that well besides for a melodrama, no drama, but it is terrible for the insurgent.
Thus, it turns out what to extend up to the mark a film, founders couldn't. The spectator after viewing, will appear in very uneasy situation and if him will ask, whether you advise to go on "Mechanic" this hypothetical spectator will shrug shoulders and will tell: «I do not know even, like a film good, but something in him doesn't suffice, though Jayson Stethem really abrupt man».
